Centrist Democracy Political Institute - Items filtered by date: October 2025
Thursday, 10 October 2024 01:13

A different kind of Marcos

Third of a series

IMEE did the unexpected. She opted out of BBM's administration alliance senatorial lineup. To refresh our memories, with former president GMA, Imee, the chief strategist, conceptualized the 2022 UniTeam, propelling BBM and Sara to victory. Imee sold the idea to former president Duterte, who was not keen on having his daughter run as BBM's vice president. The Deegong wanted Sara to run for president and confront BBM "mano-a-mano." The headstrong daughter Sara prevailed. Thus, was forged the strong sisterhood of Imee and Sara.

The UniTeam was an alliance of two political dynasties. "One from the old, discredited dynasty from the North out to regain its preeminence established by its patriarch half a century ago when Ferdinand Sr. sought to restructure Philippine society through his martial law regime. They were booted out 38 years ago by the now defunct dynasty that failed to sustain its hold on power but gave birth serendipitously to the current dynasty from the South — the Dutertes — (starting from) when Cory Aquino appointed the Deegong to the lowly post of Davao City OIC vice mayor


The Cojuangco-Aquino dynasty had no sons and daughters in positions of power, unlike the Marcos and Duterte clans. These families understand only too well the path to dominance and what it takes to get there — the sheer determination to accumulate raw power, wealth and pelf and the distribution of largesse to its allies, blind loyalty only to its own, and destruction of its rivals and perceived enemies." ("Clash of dynasties," The Manila Times, March 6, 2024)

This was perhaps very clear to Imee, that the path to rehabilitating her father's image was through an alliance with the Dutertes through Sara. But this partnership, by its very nature, was ephemeral at best. Imee's vision may have been for the two forces from the North and South to co-exist politically. But it was not to be.

Antecedents

The UniTeam's break-up weighed heavily on Imee as she is now caught in the middle — between a rock and a hard place — between the Marcos and Duterte dynasties' fight for political dominance in the coming years, perhaps even generations. But the background to this is a compelling study in internal family dynamics.

In a family steeped in Filipino tradition, we follow the concept of primogeniture — the oldest child has preeminence over the younger siblings; Imee, the oldest, is by rights the custodian of the family legacy. The Marcos literature is steeped in BBM, the spoiled one being the only male as Imelda's favorite. Imee was the father's. But more importantly, earlier in their youthful years, Imee displayed the brains and the street smarts Macoy was predisposed to. The female version of Ferdinand Sr. And the hard-headedness as shown when she defied mother Imelda on her dalliance with Tommy Manotoc (divorced from Au-au Pijuan, though Dominican Republic divorces are unrecognized in the Philippines).

'Maid in Malacañang'

This film, produced by Imee, is a fictional tale of the last three days in Malacañang during the EDSA People's Power Revolution of 1986. This provided the backdrop of the relationship of the siblings, "Ate" Imee and "Ading" BBM. Bongbong was depicted as the weak, groveling son seeking the approbation of a beleaguered father, while Imee was shown as the stronger older sister who held the family together before their exile. In a critique of the movie, Direk Cirilo has this to say: "...the movie and its depiction of BBM [was] the worst negative ad campaign against the president-elect, but the most honest opinion of BBM as a man."

This description did not sit well with BBM's spouse Liza — a fiercely protective mother hen — perhaps one of the many incidents that widened the rift between the sisters-in-law, a common occurrence in many family disputes.

Imee and Liza

These two strong-willed, powerful women in-laws could have exacerbated the rift between the two political dynasties. Imee's soul-sister Sara became anathema to Liza in that famous "bangag" incident ("Clash of dynasties," TMT, March 6, 2024). And Imee's continued loyalty to Sara is unacceptable to the influential Malacañang occupant, Liza. Despite the public display of family unity, Imee was persona non grata to Liza's Malacañang. If rumors are to be believed, not one of Imee's recommendations for a sinecure for her allies passed Liza's scrutiny. They never reached BBM's desk for approval and appointment. Again, if rumors are to be believed.

Senatorial fight in 2025

If one examines BBM's senatorial lineup, one sees an anthology of traditional politicians (trapos), tired old ex-senators longing for a comeback, questionable senators with records of corruption but sanitized with electable branded names, dregs and discards of old Marcos-Duterte alliance. Strangely, with the kind of party politics existing in the country today, to be included in the administration line-up with the huge logistics and presidential patronage, the chance of winning a seat is a real possibility. Imee's decision to go independent is puzzling at best.

An enigma, Imee was proselytizing about "a path and principles of my father," declaring, "... as his eldest, I choose to stand free and firm, like him, in believing that there should be no allegiance but to the Filipino people... It is never easy to stand alone in campaigns and politics... But that is the legacy my father left me, the legacy of 'Apo Lakay'... I chose to stand alone so that my 'adding' (sibling) would no longer be put in a difficult position, and my true friends won't hesitate. I choose to remain free and loyal — not to any group but to every Filipino." And in a very personal but maudlin way... "Thirty-five years ago, I made a promise to honor his life's work by building on this foundation. In some way, I hope that I have made you proud, Dad. We miss you every day."

Translation

I am not privy to the senator's thought process and, therefore, am unable to fathom her statements. But my experience with politicians and years of divining their actuations allow me the aptitude to translate her elegant, but to many incoherent, peroration.

Imee's friendship with Sara is true and deep. Upon crafting the UniTeam in 2022, there must have been an unspoken arrangement for Sara's turn at the presidency in 2028. It was a fair quid pro quo that may not have met the ambitions of the other dramatis personae. For one, the Marcos family must have felt that six years of BBM's term was not enough to rehabilitate Macoy's image or resurrect his legacy. None among them can take the cudgels after BBM. Liza's children are as yet unripe. Enter, therefore, the billionaire and self-proclaimed surrogate, House Speaker Martin Romualdez, out to pervert the Constitution with a revision favoring his position under a parliamentary system of government — as prime minister. An abomination to Senator Imee.

Imee, caught between her friendship with Sara and sympathy for the Dutertes and loyalty to BBM, may have no other recourse but to tread a middle path — not with her brother's, Martin's, and Liza's party, not with the Deegong's, but to go it alone as an independent. A heroic stand, a political suicide or simply what the old Filipinos call — amor propio!


Published in LML Polettiques
Wednesday, 02 October 2024 23:44

The woman DDS love to hate

Second of a series

LAST week's column ended with first lady Liza Araneta-Marcos stepping into controversy. She didn't burst into the scene, but it was a seemingly nonchalant depiction of a video clip at the airport departure ceremonies for the first couple leaving for a state visit to Vietnam. As is traditional for the president leaving the country, government VIPs send the first couple off. During such occasions, the president, by protocol, troops the line of VIPs bidding them a safe journey before he goes up the plane.

The first lady, who was not required to troop the line, arrested her climb to the plane and side-stepped to warmly greet with a "beso-beso" Executive Secretary Bersamin, the third highest-ranking government official standing beside Vice President Sara Duterte — by etiquette, the last VIP the President talks to bidding the president bon voyage. Liza shattered decorum and, in a simple gesture of indelicacy — never even gave VP Sara a nod. It was a monumental snob! And in bad taste!

Sara's fiercely loyal fan base, her Davao constituents, where she was mayor for three consecutive terms, was aghast. The Diehard Duterte Supporters (DDS), the Deegong's group that propelled him to the presidency in 2016 and now championing the daughter, are now targeting their guns at Malacañang, where a weak president with a strong and imperious consort resides. VP Sara supporters, the new DDS, have now selected another woman as their bete noire.

The rift

It all started with "Bangag'! ("Filipino women in high-stakes politics" and "Clash of dynasties," The Manila Times, Sept. 25, 2024 and March 6, 2024, respectively). In an interview with Liza (published by GMA Integrated News, April 19, 2024), "First Lady Liza Araneta Marcos said she had been avoiding Vice President Sara Duterte to show her resentment after the latter's father, former president Rodrigo Duterte, called President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. 'bangag,' or high on drugs. According to Ivan Mayrina's report on '24 Oras,' the first lady said she took offense when she saw the vice president laughing over the former president's remark at a rally in Davao City in late January. The first lady said the vice president was a 'bad shot' for her unless she said sorry or whatever. 'I'm many things, but I am not a hypocrite,' the first lady said in an interview on the 'Tune in kay Tunying.'"

This was not a preview to a catfight between strong-willed women. Behind this is the deeper rivalry between the Marcos and Duterte political dynasties. Sara, who gave way to BBM for the presidency, naively lent the Duterte family's popularity, particularly in Mindanao, to propel BBM to the presidency. Marcos owes Sara and the Dutertes for his triumph. With this, Sara rightfully was entitled to the position of the "heiress-in-waiting." BBM's children in elective positions are deemed yet unripe for the presidency. Rep. Sandro Marcos, BBM's oldest, at 33 years, needs maturation. Sen. Imee's third son, Gov. MJ of Ilocos Norte, is not in the line of succession, and his two older brothers are not into politics.

This coming 2025 midterm elections will lay the groundwork for the perpetuation of either of these dynasties. In the absence of a Marcos heir, a suitable substitute is needed. Enter the Marcos surrogate, the billionaire House Speaker Martin Romualdez, who, together with first lady Liza, form a formidable political alliance. These two are believed to hold the levers of power in government, with perhaps the acquiescence of the clueless president.

Liza

Among spouses of male Philippine presidents, Liza Araneta-Marcos ranks as perhaps the most accomplished. A practicing lawyer and an academic, she finished at the country's best schools, studied abroad and for a time lived in New York. The first glimpse of Liza's public demeanor was her interview with Boy Abunda in March 2022, just after her husband won the presidency. Asked if she was taking a government post, her retort: "I'll cross the bridge when I get there. But if ever, teaching will be good. I'm a lawyer. But entering government? No way. They can't afford me," she said with a laugh. "I'll fire all of them. I'm very New York, so it has to be my way or the highway," Liza added.

Such a response with a tinge of arrogance could be dismissed as "tongue in cheek." But just at the cusp of her new role as a first lady and wife of a Marcos, one can't dismiss the eerie feeling of déjà vu, harking back to another first lady of the 3,000 pairs of shoes.

It is unfair at this point to compare Liza to Imelda, but many of the old Marcos loyalists and protagonists still remember the infamous conjugal dictatorship — and the dread that it could be reprised in a contemporary setting. Looking back, Imelda was one of a kind, not so much for her influence over Macoy, especially in the closing days of his regime, but for being a polarizing figure who both elicited admiration and vilification.

Macoy's first lady was a woman of leisure, known for her profligacy in her New York shopping sprees, her extravagant parties, her well-choreographed state visits, and her hobnobbing with the jet-setters and Hollywood celebrities. She was appointed secretary of her own cabinet-ranked human settlements department and was elected to the Marcos "Batasang Pambansa," from whence she parlayed her position and prestige to indulge in her "edifice complex"; a slew of "Centers" — Cultural Center, Philippine Heart Center, Lung Center, Philippine International Convention Center, Manila Film Center, the Coconut Place, San Juanico Bridge — and all these are still standing.

Her extravagant lifestyle and vast collections of prime property, artwork and jewelry are emblematic of the corruption and excesses of the Marcos regime. Ferdinand Macoy is gone while Imelda lives. Urban legend has assumed a certain patina of truth: that Imelda caused the husband's downfall. Filipinos are currently fearful of a virtual doppelganger.

Unholy alliance

Liza is not an Imelda. She doesn't possess the beauty, the elegance, the stature and the political acumen of the "Iron Butterfly." But she has the intellect, the fierce qualities of a protective mother hen and the manipulative subtlety of a New Yorker, as seen in how she pushes Speaker Martin out front and center to do her bidding — demolishing Sara at the budget hearings, fronted by the speaker's acolytes, the shameless duo, Quimbo and Abante, who in the course of their inquisition lay themselves open to societal opprobrium over their public display of unexplained wealth — branded luxury watches and Birkin bags.

An erstwhile Malacañang insider minced no words in describing the first lady. Vic Rodriguez, BBM's close friend and chief strategist during the 2022 election campaign, who was rewarded with the choice position of executive secretary was unequivocal on who runs the country: "Araneta-Marcos wanted to insert her influence into revenue-generating offices like the Bureau of Customs (BoC), Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp. (Pagcor), and Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO). She even called meetings at Malacañang with Cabinet members."

Make no mistake, the puppet strings are being pulled by the lady in Malacañang.


Published in LML Polettiques

First of a series

MASS and social media have recently been inundated by a slew of news, "tsismis" and fake news involving Filipino women of diverse status, political color, different persuasions and atypical motivations. But these women have several distinctive traits in common. The first cluster is strong-willed and wields political influence either by fiat as occupying a singularly powerful elective post, as in Vice President Sara Duterte, or the first lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, unelected, nonetheless in a position of vast influence and potential for manipulation by virtue of being married to a perceived weak spouse. Some of these women maneuver around the periphery of power and are themselves powerful but refuse to brandish the same, like Sen. Imee Marcos, in whom many among those who lived and survived the martial law regime of the dictator see the traits of the father. For bad or good, those nostalgic for the old regime regret the Filipino voter's choice of the wrong Marcos. And then there are women who have been unseated from power through the whims of dysfunctional government institutions like the fugitive and suspected Chinese sleeper agent Mayor Alice Guo of Bamban, Tarlac.

The other category is women who, by their notoriety and their strategic personal relations, took advantage of their 15 minutes of fame, attempting to tear to shreds the reputations of the powerful and the mighty as in the disgruntled paramour revealing juicy tidbits about her former Davao politico-businessman lover who has long been removed from power and tale-telling distasteful exposés about the Malacañang "polvoron"-snorting crowd. And these anecdotes are given credence through female internet personalities who rule social media, providing pulpits through their YouTube video blogs. These "Marites" with thousands of followers lap up any scraps of gossip thrown their way, propelling the same to go viral. This is gossip in the fringes providing entertainment to the inane. These women of the second cluster are not the subjects of this column ("The spy and the paramour," The Manila Times, Aug. 14, 2024).

Sara

The vice president appeared before the House Committee on Appropriations hearings recently to do two simple things: defend the budget of the Office of the Vice President (OVP) and respond to queries on the expenditures of the Department of Education from which she recently resigned — in disgust. She did neither, telegraphing instead to the honorable members of the budget committee what she really thought of them.

What came out in the hearing was that she disbursed her confidential fund of P125 million in just 11 days, P35 million on the purchase of supplies and P3.5 million for chairs, tables and computers; another P40 million for the provision of medical and food aid. On top of these, she has caused the publication of a children's book, which she purportedly authored to the tune of P10 million for 200,000 copies — while she was education secretary.

The catch here is that all these are disallowed by the Commission on Audit (CoA). And the book was reportedly plagiarized from a US author and used by Sara as campaign material. It is not so much the amounts spent but her attitude when asked to explain and her demeanor at the hearings showing her disdain for her inquisitors.

Let me quote one of her critics: "Sara Duterte, I believe, is sick of a narcissistic personality disorder, as others in her family are. When she went to the House (August 27 budget hearing), she knew it would put her to shame. Her game plan fits the narcissist's playbook to a T: she will control the interpellations so that she can dodge the most threatening questions. Once in control of the process, she can throw squid tactics so as to transfer blame..." (Antonio J. Montalvan 2nd, Vera Files).

Sara's behavior by any standard was appalling, especially for one who has been installed by millions of Filipinos to the second highest office of the land. On the other hand, she had compelling reasons to behave that way as the House of Representatives was enemy territory, bastion of the allies of the Marcos dynasty. Sara was reacting to the despicable behavior of a female committee member, "Madame Chair" Stella Luz Quimbo, a former lowly academic who is herself now being roasted on social media for her tasteless display of very expensive branded luxury watches and bags. A side story to the hearings yet relevant. The hearings are ostensibly structured to scrutinize all branches of government to ensure public monies are spent for the public good. Incongruently, corruption by an inquisitor has gone viral.

But this modern-day Spanish Inquisition of an inquiry was obviously designed to politically crucify Sara, being the most capable Duterte to dislodge the Marcoses from their dynastical proclivities. And the virtual Torquemada pulls the strings unseen from behind — the self-proclaimed heir to the Marcos dynasty, Martin Romualdez. A summary of three articles from The Manila Times is excerpted to put things in proper perspective. ("Clash of dynasties," "The self-appointed heir, heiress," "We are being played," TMT, March 6 and 13; and April 27.)

A capricious pact

Since the dissolution of the "UniTeam" of the Marcos-Duterte political dynasties forged in 2022, Sara, who could have won the presidency but gave way to BBM as his VP and with her inclusion in the Marcos administration and promises of prestigious and important positions, assumed the cloak of heiress-apparent. But this tenuous partnership was never meant to last one presidential cycle. The Marcos family, in power for decades and booted out of power and in exile for decades more since 1986, saw the need to rehabilitate the patriarch's image as Philippine dictator during his martial law regime — and continue the Marcos legacy of "Ang Bagong Lipunan." It was obvious that BBM's watch of six- years may not be enough. Former president Duterte foresaw this in 2022 and vehemently objected to naïve daughter Sara running as Marcos' VP — allowing BBM to use the Duterte prestige to propel the Marcoses back to power.

Thus, the break came at an Apollo Quiboloy Maisug prayer rally on Feb. 21, 2024, when the Dutertes clamored for BBM, first lady Liza, and the surrogate heir Speaker Martin Romualdez to step down from their posts, with Deegong describing BBM as "bangag" — a dope addict. While the unthinking male Dutertes were disparaging the Malacañang occupants, Sara was on the sidelines, lending some sort of credence and approbation by her presence and silence. This did not sit well with the first lady.

This was just the start of a series of Pastor Quiboloy-sponsored Philippine-wide "Maisug" prayer rallies that were designed to erode the credibility of the regime. At first, BBM's reaction to the personal slanders was dismissed as the "fentanyl-induced" ravings of the former president. But these persistent assaults echoed by the allies of the Deegong were deemed to be the ultimate in lese majeste. With the tame and weak reaction of the President defending the honor of the family, the first lady Liza stepped in and made her move.

Next week:
The woman DDS love to hate

 

Published in LML Polettiques
Wednesday, 18 September 2024 23:06

Pulse Asia — a mad scramble for the presidency

Last of two parts

LAST week's column ended with a rhetorical question: which political dynasty will dominate Philippine politics post-2028 upon the Marcos-Duterte coalition breakup? This conundrum is tangential to the intent of Pulse Asia, per se, but the data points continue to give out vignettes forming an integral part of this narrative.

Focus will now shift to the comparative analysis of the surveys on President Marcos Jr., former president Duterte and their surrogates; Vice President Sara Duterte, scion of the Duterte clan and House Speaker Martin Romualdez, self-proclaimed heir to the Marcoses — while BBM and Imee's children are politically ripening. These are the two contemporary political dynasties competing for dominance in this coming midterm elections toward the presidential contest that will spell the dominance of either in 2028 or beyond.

Pulse Asia can't reflect the consequences of the clash between BBM and Sara. Their third quarter survey, however, could suggest the same. But to refresh our memories, the actual breakup may have occurred with the surging popularity of VP Sara, buoyed up by the still-popular Duterte, putting the Marcos dynasty in jeopardy. BBM then allowed the International Criminal Court (ICC) to resume the investigation of the Deegong's drug wars and human rights violations — a virtual Damocles sword. When he was president, Duterte cut ties with the ICC, curtailing its ability to pursue an investigation of the extrajudicial killings.

In retaliation, a series of prayer rallies was initiated by a vengeful ex-president, sponsored by Quiboloy, the "Appointed Son of God" who gave Duterte a platform, SMNI, to attack BBM. Excerpts from my column quoted her: "There was no mincing of words. Pastor Apollo Quiboloy, Appointed Son of God (ASOG), on Feb. 21, 2024, called for... President BBM (and first lady Liza) and Speaker Martin Romualdez to step down from your posts. You are no longer worthy to be our trusted leaders. These echoed Davao Mayor 'Baste' Duterte's demands for BBM to resign in a prayer rally in Davao last January 28. And in an expected ad hominem by the Duterte himself, he described BBM as 'basag' (a drug addict)!?" ("Clash of dynasties," TMT, June 3, 2024)

Martin Romualdez — Cardinal Richelieu

Enter the billionaire and ambitious Speaker Martin — more of a Romualdez than a Marcos — who holds a grudge against Quiboloy's SMNI for exposing his P1.8 billion travel allowances and his indiscretions in the lower house, imperiling his presidential ambitions. SMNI's franchise subsequently was suspended — shades of ABS-CBN's gutting by the Deegong during his watch.

But Martin is a character of his own. With his initial moves, using the prestige of the Marcoses, he assumed the role of the Marcos couple's Cardinal Richelieu, serving the family while consolidating his own supremacy at the powerful lower house of Congress — biding his time, manipulating the weak president with perhaps the tentative but tacit acquiescence of the consort. But unlike the French Cardinal, the speaker wanted it all.

In the Pulse Asia survey, mentioned in my column last week, BBM's approval rating collapsed to 53 percent from a high of 84 percent, while Duterte's equivalent rating in his first two quarters in 2016 even went up to 88 percent. But the more relevant figures to ponder upon are those of the surrogates' current trust ratings: VP Sara's was a high of 69 percent while that of Speaker Martin, a dismal 35 percent! To the Marcos heir-apparent, this was unconscionable.

VP Sara's demolition

Thus, the rival heiress' head's ongoing decapitation. It started with Marcos and the House stripping VP Sara of her discretionary funds as education secretary and later the budget of the Office of the Vice President. As I wrote in the same column, "Sara's desire to assume a high-profile role in BBM's Cabinet as secretary of defense was not granted. The education portfolio was a poor substitute. And to add salt to the wound, Sara's VP office was stripped of P500 million and DepEd of P150 million in confidential intelligence funds (CIF).

"Intelligence funds" are nebulous purposed confidential funds originally for the use of surveillance by police and defense agencies for security purposes. The practice of allocating these funds to civilian agencies and favored local government units (LGU) has skirted the guidelines, disbursements and liquidation of the same as they are exempted from the Commission on Audit's (CoA) standard procedures. More often than not, they are unaudited and may be deemed unconstitutional. These lucrative funds have been used anomalously as campaign funds bloating the personal coffers of powerful politicians, mayors/governors and agency heads. BBM's own office (OP) was allocated P4.5 billion — half of the P10.64 billion CIF in the 2024 budget."

It did not help that during the current 2025 congressional budget hearing, the beleaguered Sara's display of belligerence and arrogance, mimicking a now toothless Duterte patron — did not sit well with the committee members. It pissed off both allies and detractors — doubtless to the glee of the speaker's cohorts.

With Richelieu in the saddle, the relentless degrading of Sara and the Dutertes continues. Now in the current hearings of both houses are the exposition of new evidence from Davao prison inmates of the Deegong's alleged elimination of convicted Chinese drug lords. A patchwork of cases and innuendoes stitched in a quilt of old and new are being revived through the grandstanding congressional hearings, not the proper courts; the resuscitation of the Pharmally anomalies of officials around the presidential orbit that could involve the Deegong himself; tying this up with POGO that began to proliferate during the Duterte administration. All these meant to engulf the Dutertes now that the dynasty head was no longer in power.

Richelieu's ascendancy

This brings us to the question of a possible reversal of roles in the political power structure of government. The resident Malacañang couple has recently become vulnerable with the exposé of the use of illegal drugs in "polvoron" parties. ("The spy and the paramour," TMT, Aug. 14, 2024)

The cognoscenti in the highest echelons of government, including the Marites of the social media, have begun to speculate that the first couple's vulnerability plays into the hands of Speaker Martin, who may now morph into a 'Svengali' coming into his own — and holds the power to pursue investigations of 'polvoron' usage and proliferation even in the hallowed halls of Malacañang. The alliance of the speaker and the couple, particularly the powerful consort, may be undergoing some sort of mutation. One cannot help but hazard a guess that we may be confronted with the classical situation of the "tail wagging the dog." Who now controls the levers of power in this government?

Until Pulse Asia frames these questions and injects the same into the consciousness of the Filipinos as part of the process of educating them about their plight — the data points can only reveal nuances where a tale can be woven subject to the biases of those that interpret the same. This column awaits the findings of the research for the third quarter of this year and beyond.

Meanwhile, we assume full responsibility for the conclusions and speculations arrived at from these data points.

Published in LML Polettiques
Thursday, 12 September 2024 20:12

Pulse Asia research — post-EDSA PH presidents

First of a series

RECENTLY, a friend shared with me the latest analysis of Pulse Asia survey data on approval/disapproval ratings of post-1986 Philippine presidents — Gloria Macapagal Arroyo (GMA, 2001-2010), Benigno Aquino III (PNoy, 2010-2016) and Rodrigo Duterte (Digong, 2016-2022). These data gathered over the years are compared with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s (BBM) performance from the time he took office in June 2022 to the present — a span of eight quarters.

These figures are achromatic, but each data point is a reflection of people's perceptions — photographs capturing realities at a point in time. Each has a story to tell and for those who seek to extract some meaning, it is incumbent upon them to dig deeper, giving flesh to the numbers, making them alive. This column will attempt to extrapolate from these data the narrative behind each and extricate lessons to be learned, from presidential track records, their ups and downs, their triumphs and failures and nuances, hopefully as a guide to the current administration of BBM to where it should go — as we want it to succeed for the sake of the country and the Filipinos. How the questions were framed by Pulse Asia and asked of the participants of the survey to elicit desired responses may be subject to the biases of both. Additionally, this column takes the liberty of writing into the surveys supplementary information and nuances gleaned from current events and news headlines. Interpreting the data points and weaving them into a coherent narrative is the primary responsibility of this column.

What survey suggests

BBM assumed office in June of 2022 with a high approval rating. His 84 percent is a figure many politicians will die for. But for many of the older generation who lived through the dark days of martial law, when the incumbent's father reigned supreme, it was a shock. But the data speaks for itself indicating the attrition of the numbers of the denizens of the old regime prior to 1986. After four decades since the lamented EDSA People Power Revolution, the dramatis personae and the hordes of ordinary citizen-participants are gone. The rest are now in the minority. The current Pulse Asia data reflects a new reality. The Marcoses are back!

Thus, the Pulse Asia survey becomes more interesting and relevant when focused on both Duterte and BBM. Consider the following: both had high approval ratings when they first burst into the Philippine political scene over the political carcasses of their opponents: Mar Roxas in 2016 and Vice President Leni Robredo in 2022 — both remnants of the "Yellow Army." Duterte had a commanding 86 percent and BBM 84 percent ratings.

But the dormant seeds of a political maelstrom started to germinate then. While BBM garnered 58.77 percent of the vote — the first majority president since the fifth republic in 1986 — his running mate Sara Duterte, the Digong's daughter, garnered 61.53 percent more votes than BBM. The Digong has always maintained that daughter Sara, who was then more popular, should have run as president and not BBM. From the outset, Duterte has always harbored a quiescent disdain for the Marcoses, particularly BBM, whom he accused of being "bangag," a vituperative appellation for an illegal drug user.

To put things in perspective, the analysis compares Duterte's figures with BBM's in the intervening similar number of months — Duterte's first two years of equivalent eight quarters in 2016. The relevancy of such a comparison rests on several factors. Duterte was BBM's immediate predecessor and the issues, although with some dissimilarities, overlap the two administrations.

On world affairs, the Ukraine war, the Palestine conflict, Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran and even EDCA and our relations with America — these are somewhat irrelevant, not even reflected in the surveys. But closer to home, China's bullying over our "West Philippine Seas" (WPS) and our fishermen's plight on being barred from their traditional fishing grounds are issues BBM failed to address to the satisfaction of the clientele — the Filipino. Add to this his inability to face squarely microeconomic problems, NFA stock and rice shortages, inflation and high prices.

Instead, BBM went off-tangent, allowing his cohorts in the Lower House, headed by his cousin, Speaker Martin Romualdez, to embark on charter change (Cha-cha) under the guise of constitutional economic amendments through people's initiative. The speaker — more a Romualdez than a Marcos — fancies himself as the Marcos heir-apparent in a collision course with Duterte's own heiress, VP Sara. A shift in government to a parliamentary system gives Martin an edge to head the next administration as prime minister — a fool's errand.

Comparative to the first eight quarters in 2016 and 2022, the Deegong never went down below an 80 percent approval rating. BBM's was a precipitous drop to a dismal 53 percent, with his disapproval soaring from 13 percent to 29 percent. What gives?

Politics permeating survey results

The thesis of this column in the comparative analysis of the Pulse Asia data is that politics and political rivalry are the primary root of BBM's current difficulties. The economy and other factors besetting government are mere peripherals.

It was clear from the very start of BBM's regime that the rehabilitation of his father's image as a Philippine dictator during his martial law regime was his primordial objective. The resurrection of the ghost of Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. (Macoy), therefore requires the negation of all subsequent post-Macoy governments from President Cory Aquino, his nemesis, through General Ramos, a cousin, to GMA, PNoy and especially to the regime of President Duterte, whose daughter, Sara, helped propel him to the presidency, and whom he felt compelled to denigrate to push through his family's agenda. It is worthwhile to be reminded, too, that Sara's grandfather, Davao's former governor Vicente Duterte, was a former Cabinet member of the elder Marcos, establishing their political pedigrees. The Duterte political dynasty, composed of Sara's brothers in elective positions, have professed regret over the Deegong allowing the burial of Makoy on hallowed ground — the Libingan ng mga Bayani — even calling for Marcos Jr.'s resignation as president.

In the intervening months, issues and crises have cropped up, which now involved even the first lady, Liza Araneta-Marcos, an accomplished lawyer and academic who emerged from the shadows of the Marcos-Romualdez clan and projected an image of an arrogant and powerful consort but an unelected power wielder herself — a stark contrast to a perceived weak and docile and unlettered husband. These are all reflected in the Pulse Asia survey suggesting that BBM is leading the country in the wrong direction.

Open split between political dynasties

Captured in the Pulse Asia surveys are just the nuances of the final break in what was once regarded as a "UniTeam-Dream Team" represented by the President and his vice president. I quote excerpts from my column of Aug. 21, 2024: "...what precipitated the breakup of the 2022 Marcos-Duterte coalition was the ultimate question: Whose dynasty dominates and holds political power post-2028 and beyond? This necessitated the defanging of rival heiress and president-in-waiting VP Sara, rendering her castrated as VP and education secretary."

To be continued
Published in LML Polettiques
Wednesday, 04 September 2024 10:37

Ukraine war — Armageddon postponed

assdsd
Published in LML Polettiques
Wednesday, 04 September 2024 07:37

Ukraine war — Armageddon postponed

Last of two parts

IT has been a month since Ukraine invaded Russia, ostensibly underscoring Putin's inutility and continued humiliation with his allies and, more importantly, his credibility with the Russian people who have been led to believe that the original Russian invasion 30 months ago in February 2022, was a short punitive sortie that Putin promised would end in a few days upon the fall of Kyiv bringing Ukraine to its knees and back in the Russian fold.

Putin's adventure is now in its third year. And the end is not in sight. But Russia now occupies a large swath of land in the Donbas region and those adjoining the Crimea. Russian forces are now entrenched in the eastern part of Ukraine bordering Russia.

Putin sold the fiction to the Russian people that this incursion into Ukraine was upon the demand of the Russian-speaking population of the Donbas, where the local Russian population was allegedly facing persecution and needed protection from the Ukrainian government — dubbing this act as "denazification" of Ukraine.

Antecedents of Russo-Ukraine war

To put things in perspective, although Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, this conflict had been germinating years earlier. This year, 2024, is the 10th anniversary of the Ukraine-Russo conflict. I quote excerpts from my column ("Ukraine war revisited — America speaks with forked tongue," The Manila Times, June 14, 2023).

"Ukraine's invasion by Russia was the sum total of NATO's relentless encroachment over the years that included the CIA-sponsored Euromaidan revolution in 2013 resulting in a regime change in Ukraine, which in turn gave Putin the alibi to annex Ukraine's southern peninsula of Crimea in 2014 and recognize the Russian-sponsored separatist states of Donetsk and Luhansk in the southeast, collectively known as the Donbas region."

Further, the seeds of this conflict were planted during the fall of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) during the intervening years of 1989-1992 ("Ukraine: Putin's war — a briefer," TMT, March 9, 2022; and "Ukraine war — heading toward Armageddon," TMT, Aug. 28, 2024).

What was untenable was that upon the dissolution of the USSR, then-Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev extracted a promise from America and Germany that NATO would not enlarge "one inch eastward" after Gorbachev disbanded the Soviet military alliance (Warsaw Pact). But NATO's later enticement of the old Warsaw Pact countries, particularly Ukraine, into its fold was a negation of that pledge. The entire premise of NATO enlargement to Eastern Europe was a violation of this agreement.

"Just imagine NATO with its short-range ballistic missiles (SRBM) at the borders of Russia. How was it different when Khrushchev in 1962 stationed missiles in Cuba just outside America's borders? Kennedy drew the line then as Putin similarly has drawn the line now. NATO's overture to Ukraine after the USSR's collapse is tantamount to Putin's red line that America and the West have long crossed. America and NATO, in essence, actually provided a casus belli for Putin's acts."

Storyline of Ukraine's Russian invasion

The Aug. 6, 2024, Ukraine invasion of Kursk Oblast brought the war to Russian soil — the first time since WW 2. Although Putin's control of state media on putting the lid on Ukraine's invasion has been almost total, morsels of news trickled down through the heavy censorship. For one, people from hundreds of displaced communities in Kursk and Belgorod were evacuated, and these frightened citizens disseminated their fear to relatives, friends and other citizens in adjoining oblasts. The images of hordes of evacuees on the roads reminiscent of the aftermath of the 1943 Nazi blitzkrieg have gone viral. Suddenly, hostilities could be at every Russian's doorstep, and the realities of bloodshed could become part of their daily lives.

In the summer of 2023, Ukraine conducted a much-awaited counter-offensive to reoccupy Donbas. That failed. It suffered 200,000 casualties, while Russia lost more than three times that much. But "mano-a-mano" with Russia in a war of attrition was a one-sided affair. Comparatively, Russia is the larger combatant with more resources and greater wealth available, a bigger defense industrial base and more warm bodies. Ukraine solely dependent on NATO and the US for its military resources is a no-match. Ukraine was forced to shift back to its current defensive mode.

Russia's subsequent mobilization was a disaster where more than a million of its young men fled the country to avoid conscription. National conscriptions were unpopular with Russian mothers whose sons came back maimed or in caskets, inducing political dissent among the populace, anathema to a closed communist society. Similarly, finding volunteers for Ukraine was challenging where draft dodgers of fighting age fled abroad through Poland and Slovakia — according to the BBC.

The Western press further revealed that Russia outgunned Ukraine on artillery by 20 to one until the US Congress finally approved $60 billion in military aid in April 2024. The best estimates are that it is still outgunned in artillery shells eight to one. But Ukraine has the advantage of advanced NATO weapons technology and better trained and motivated manpower.

Even with these conditions, Russia managed slow, steady, methodical gains across the eastern front with its quantity of firepower and its young cannon fodder. Russian forces are embedded in the oblast of Luhansk with two major cities of Severodonetsk and Lyshansk; Donetsk with the city of Mariupol; Zaporizhzhia and its nuclear power plant and the city of Melitopol. The bloody battle and recent occupation of Bakhmut and Avdiivka, major Ukraine cities, was disastrous for Ukraine. Since the war began, roughly one-third of Ukraine's territory has been in Russian hands.

With war weariness descending on both countries, but with the momentum on the Russian side, Putin, last June 2024, set his own terms for peace, demanding that Ukraine withdraw its forces from the four provinces of Donbas and even those still unoccupied by Russia. Furthermore, it demanded that Crimea, occupied since 2014, be recognized as Russian. And more importantly, it abandoned its desire for membership in NATO and assumed a status of permanent neutrality. Zelenskyy rejected these supercilious conditions.

Hemorrhaging soldiers and weaponry and losing ground since 2023, Zelenskyy and his military leadership decided they needed to wrest the initiative from Putin. Thus, this gamble on a bold attack on the sparsely defended Kursk Oblast. It was a desperate gesture of bravado that could work — if the strategy were to use this occupation of Russian territory as a bargaining chip for an eventual ceasefire and peace treaty. But more importantly Zelenskyy has brought the war's realities to Russian citizens who for long have been deceived by Putin. This has now become a contest between Russian mothers versus Putin. How long will Putin hold on to power amid the babushkas' and Rossiyani's wrath?

Ukraine's lifeblood depends on America and NATO's sustenance. But Putin holds one card he hopes will be dealt with this November. His friend, Trump, is running for the US presidency. Trump has already declared that he will solve the war on day one of his presidency. He will suspend the shipment of war materiel to Zelenskyy.

Little does he know that his friend will lose the presidency. Meanwhile, Armageddon is postponed!

Published in LML Polettiques
Wednesday, 28 August 2024 23:43

Ukraine war — heading toward Armageddon?

I HAD devoted 13 of my columns to the Russo-Ukraine war starting the week of Feb. 24, 2022, when Russian Premier Putin made his move and invaded Ukraine. This 14th article is precipitated by the invasion by Ukraine of Russian territory. On Aug. 6, 2024, Ukraine's army entered the Kursk region, capturing dozens of settlements in the biggest offensive by a foreign army on Russian soil since Hitler's Operation Barbarossa in June 1941 — 83 years ago. Zelenskyy's ostensible strategy is to create a buffer zone around the 1,000 square kilometer occupied territory to prevent Russian cross-border strikes and daily hostile shelling of Ukraine's civilian population. This invasion was a long time in coming and "tit-for-tat" for Russia's occupation of Ukraine's Donbas region.

NATO and even Putin himself believe that the recent Ukrainian sortie improves Zelenskyy's negotiating position for the coming ceasefire talks, if ever, the Donbas region and Crimea in exchange for the Kursk Oblast. Both sides need a respite from this war, time to lick their wounds and regroup before resuming the conflict at some future date.

But this invasion is unraveling Putin's image as the strongman, destroying the myths he so judiciously built up over the years: Russia is impregnable and invincible, owning the second-largest army in the world. Putin's credibility is called into question, subjecting him to humiliation among his allies and to the world — and to his own people.

America and NATO are taking a curious stance. They have always cautioned Zelenskyy not to go beyond Ukraine's border and imposed restrictions on the use of Western weapons to strike targets deeper into Russian territory for fear Russia will respond in kind, expanding the war and engulfing Western and Eastern Europe and beyond. Ukraine's leaders have repeatedly requested NATO for weapons that can give them the capability to hit targets inside Russia itself, which NATO was reluctant to allow. Zelenskyy has sought authorization for long-range strikes on Russian air bases and other infrastructure used to pummel Ukraine's energy facilities and other civilian targets. Ukraine was grudgingly recently granted a squadron of F16 jets — which were presumably used to accomplish air dominance during this invasion. With this, Zelenskyy has handed them a fait accompli, stating, "It is crucial that our partners remove barriers that hinder us from weakening Russian positions in the way this war demands."

Implications of Ukraine invasion

This invasion has "presented a dilemma to Russia" — as Biden put it succinctly — yet NATO allies may have no choice but simply be "forced to good." Putin's saber-rattling on using tactical nuclear weapons has been silenced lately as he was warned by China against this alternative. And the immediate and total destruction of Russia in retaliation is a no-brainer.

Still, this invasion could provoke a significant backlash inside Russia as the tightly guarded press freedom and news dissemination of the massive evacuation of the population around Kursk filters the larger Russian populace, bringing the war uncomfortably close. Putin's leadership may be put to the test, undermining his authority, although no immediate change in leadership is expected as Putin has a firm grip on power. Nevertheless, Putin's hands-on involvement in the war has put the blame squarely on him, resulting in several of his generals being sacked and sent to the front and disappearing — if rumors are to be believed. This recent development reveals weaknesses in Russia's military readiness and morale. According to Ukrainian intelligence services, more and more soldiers of the Russian army want to lay down their arms; the number of Russian deserters has been higher than ever in the past weeks.

This invasion, gaining confidence for Ukraine, may lead it to seek and reclaim more territory and certainly lead to an escalation of hostilities. Putin and the Russian leadership will not tolerate Ukraine forces to be ensconced in Kursk for long. To retake the oblast, he will not spare the remaining population and its destruction as it did with the Ukraine cities around the Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia oblasts.

Overall, this temporary advantage to Ukraine will precipitate a reevaluation of NATO's support that could lead to calls for negotiations or a ceasefire. This is for the best interest particularly of the US now in the midst of a presidential election trending towards a Democratic win — a known factor to Ukraine. A Trump government with his admiration and schoolboy crush on Putin and the former's declaration to "end the war in one day" may prove to be a step towards unknown and uncharted territory.

Thus, the long-term consequences of this invasion could reshape the geopolitical landscape in Eastern Europe, leading to a reconfiguration of alliances, increased military presence of NATO in Eastern Europe, and a shift in the balance of power in the region.

Putin has threatened to get his forces in Kaliningrad to move into western Ukraine with no specifics, as Kaliningrad is Russia's enclave along the Baltic Sea and has no avenue toward Ukraine except through Lithuania and Poland — NATO countries. But it has sufficiently disturbed the three Baltic states — Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia — that they issued a chilling warning: they're prepared to send troops into Ukraine without NATO approval. Fearing Russia's growing aggression, these Baltic nations see themselves as next in line. With historical ties to the Soviet Union and recent Russian threats, they're taking matters into their own hands — preventing Putin from mimicking his American acolyte to "Make Russia Great Again!"

Antecedents of the war

To put things in proper perspective, this development in the Ukraine-Russo war brings us to its beginnings. In my March 2022 column, I traced the seeds of this conflict from the fall of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). "The collapse started on Premier Mikhail Gorbachev's watch when the USSR loosened its grip on the Eastern European countries (Soviets) composing the USSR, allowing them multi-party elections that began a slow process of democratization. This led to the destabilization of communist control, and the ensuing momentum caused the greatest modern symbol of communist Soviet hegemony to fall — the Berlin Wall."

America, the USSR's greatest Cold War rival, was not exactly gloating on the sidelines. Nevertheless, this was a humiliating blow to the hardline Russian communist elite — though the Russian people and the freed Soviet republics welcomed Gorbachev's reform agenda and subsequently President Boris Yeltsin's rapid economic reforms."

Around this time, too, was the rise of a despot. "One who witnessed the fall of the Berlin Wall was a KGB apparatchik, an undercover spy in East Germany named Vladimir Putin. The aftermath was chaotic for Russia, which lost 15 of its Soviets and 2 million square miles of territory, including the second biggest after Russia itself — Ukraine.

This was seen as the century's greatest geopolitical disaster, ushering in political and economic chaos in part caused by the unfamiliarity of capitalist concepts introduced after decades of socialism. This tectonic shift in the economic paradigm brought to the surface the shady part of capitalism — graft and corruption pervading all levels of bureaucracy. Putin came at the right time during Russia's metamorphosis."

To be continued
Published in LML Polettiques
MY column last week elicited comments on the juicy Cathy Binag and the paramour's exposés on the snorting habits of the first family — particularly of Liza — and Malacañang's inner sanctum. This accusation has been met with deafening silence — except for half-assed denials and attempts at a weak defense by the President's men. This titillated the paramour, now riding high in her newfound notoriety, squeezing the last moments of her 15 minutes of fame, bragging that she is somewhat safeguarded by a coterie of military personnel or ex-military types — and her threat of further disclosures contained in a hundred USBs detailing further interesting vignettes of shenanigans by powerful politicians, to be automatically circulated if something untoward were to happen to her.

These incriminating extracts are the fruit of the 10-year dalliance with lover, former congressman Tony Boy Floirendo, in the corridors of power. He has been reticent through all these. And it could be the right response for a scion of one of Davao's leading families. Or the man is simply intimidated by the proverbial "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." But to be kind, Tony Boy may just be gentlemanly enough to protect his aggrieved but decent family — a famous wife and hardworking and private children.

But Binag's rendering may just be the opening salvo to the political skirmish between two political dynasties for control of political power in the coming mid-term elections that could impact the presidential election in 2028.

Inevitable collision of forces

Both the Marcos and Duterte families are the current leading political dynasties, with the other 100 or so Philippine dynasties realigning themselves for their own maximum advantage, from the oldest, the Ortegas of La Union, to the Garcias and Osmeñas of the Visayas, and the notorious Ampatuans and the Mangudadatus of Mindanao.

To put things in perspective, what precipitated the breakup of the 2022 Marcos-Duterte coalition was the ultimate question: Whose dynasty dominates and holds political power post-2028 and beyond? The Duterte patriarch was unhappy with Sara giving way to the Marcos scion for the presidency, allowing the Marcos resurrection. From this vantage point, the Marcos family sought to rehabilitate their own patriarch's image, burdened by the decades of martial law and the possibility of extending their own rule through their progeny.

This necessitated the defanging of rival heiress and president-in-waiting VP Sara, rendering her castrated as VP and education secretary ("Two presidents: Impact on mid-term elections," TMT, May 15, 2024). The accusation of BBM being "bangag" by Duterte and sons was the Deegong's response to Marcos allowing the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate further Duterte's vulnerabilities — his war on drugs and the deadly "Oplan Tokhang" that laid waste thousands of innocent lives, the extrajudicial killings (EJKs).

Revival of 2017-2018 illegal drug shipment

Cases against the Deegong's son, Davao City congressman Paolo, untouchable while he was vice mayor of Davao in 2017 during his father's presidency, are being revived, linking him to the $125 million narcotics bust, which he has denied. He was accused by then-senator Antonio Trillanes IV of being a member of a Chinese criminal syndicate — "complete with a 'dragon-like' tattoo with secret digits on his back."

Current House hearings by a so-called quad committee — made up of the Committees of Dangerous Drugs, Public Order and Safety, Human Rights, and Public Accounts — on illegal drugs, POGOs, illegal purchases of land and the war on drugs on Aug. 16, 2024, brought in a former customs intelligence officer Jimmy Guban who named Paolo Duterte; Manases Carpio, the husband of Vice President Sara; and Michael Yang, erstwhile Duterte Chinese adviser, as the owner of the container with magnetic lifters which were part of the shipment of shabu in 2018 worth P11 billion.

Davao City councilor Nilo "Small" Abellera was dragged in as the person who asked Guban to expedite the entry of shabu shipments that belong to "Michael Yang, Pulong Duterte and Mans" — Small's business partners, he being their trusted associate.

Guban, himself convicted of drug trafficking charges and whose credibility is questionable, further named former environment undersecretary Benny Antiporda for facilitating the release of the shipment from the Manila International Container Port (MICP).

This time, the above hearings were conducted at the Villa de Bacolor Convention Center in Pampanga as an offshoot of the ongoing circus of hearings that purported to show the government's crackdown on POGO hubs operated by Chinese high-rollers through Filipino cohorts.

Which hearings involved the participation of dismissed Mayor Alice Guo, accused of being a "Chinese sleeper-spy agent" ("The spy and the paramour," TMT, Aug. 14, 2024) and whose fingers are traceable to the Chinese POGO companies' land buying and operations in Pampanga.

This convoluted mishmash of hearings, revival of old cases, and accusations of criminality proven or unproven aired during grandstanding congressional hearings given space in mass media are fodder for this election season and this type of dirty politics practiced by people holding the reins of power. It is a sad testament to the type of politics being played by all sides: throw whatever dirt can be thrown and simply work on those that will stick.

ICC probe — Deegong's 'sword of Damocles'

Late in the Deegong administration, the International Criminal Court (ICC) conducted a full investigation of President Duterte for his alleged role in crimes against humanity during his controversial war on drugs. The investigation focused on allegations of extrajudicial killings and other human rights violations. But on November 21, Marcos, who was then "goody-goody" with the Deegong, acceded to the former's demand to suspend or quash the investigation as the Philippines was no longer a member of the ICC and that Marcos was already conducting its own investigations into the drug war.

However, in early 2023, the ICC decided to resume its investigation, stating that the Philippines had not genuinely investigated the alleged crimes. The Philippine government and Marcos did not object. Duterte, who has denied any wrongdoing, has been critical of the ICC and has stated that he would not cooperate with the court. Marcos, whose relations with the Dutertes have soured, allowed the ICC to continue its investigation. The Deegong, feeling BBM had crossed his red line, went ballistic. Thus began the flurry of accusations on BBM as "bangag"!

The pot calling the kettle black

If the paramour and the Dutertes are to be believed, we have a first family happily snorting together following the dictum of "a family that snorts together stays, prospers and rules together." But at whose expense, while the head honcho and the spouse together take the helm of the ship of state? It certainly brings to the fore the question of whether the president is sober enough or even fit to be president — and if not — can his responsibility be passed over to an unelected surrogate, his very powerful consort — similarly stoned!

On the other hand, we have a dysfunctional family from Davao — and if Marcos and his cohorts are to be believed, the male members are the main actors in the country's drive toward a narco-state. This puts us Filipinos between a rock and a hard place — or, for the mythologists — between Scylla and Charybdis.

God help us!
Published in LML Polettiques
Page 8 of 114